Case 2410846/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Coletto v Gemma Kane t/a Glitterati Parties — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410846/2019
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grundy
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Coletto
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Grundy in Liverpool, held that the correct respondent was Gemma Kane t/a Glitterati Parties. It rejected the claimant's strike-out application, and the holiday pay issue fell away because the respondent had paid the sums due.
On notice pay, the tribunal found that the dismissal letter referred to "conduct" rather than gross misconduct. Although the claimant accepted that she had joined a WhatsApp group that was derogatory about the respondent, the tribunal found no evidence that this caused or undermined the business. It therefore treated the dismissal as misconduct rather than gross misconduct and held that the claimant was entitled to one week's notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On written terms and conditions, the tribunal accepted that the respondent had failed to provide them. Applying section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the judge said a two-week award was reasonable rather than four weeks, noted that the omission had since been rectified, and awarded £324. The total award was £486, comprising £162 for notice pay and £324 for the failure to provide written terms and conditions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn after the respondent paid the sums due. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal letter referred to conduct rather than gross misconduct, accepted there was no evidence the claimant's WhatsApp group activity undermined the business, and held that one week's notice was payable under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £162 |
| Other | Award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written terms and conditions; the tribunal considered two weeks' pay to be a reasonable award. | Upheld | — | £324 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £486
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.