Case 2410847/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Czernikowska v International Contract Packing Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410847/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Czernikowska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against International Contract Packing Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs D Czernikowska's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £744.08. The written judgment also included a notice about statutory interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating the relevant decision day as 24 February 2020, but it did not set out any separate interest amount in the judgment text provided.
No other claims are determined in the extracted judgment text, and no discrimination, dismissal, or contract findings beyond the wages deduction appear in the decision itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £744.08. | Upheld | — | £744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £744
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.