Case 2410896/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Fisher v Carewatch Care Services Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2410896/2018
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Fisher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 August 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs S Fisher an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal said strike-out was being considered because, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake [2021] UKSC 8, the claim did not appear to have reasonable prospects of success, the claimant had failed to reply to the tribunal's correspondence dated 29 June 2021, and it appeared that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Fisher did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Batten therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no merits determination and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not restate the substantive heads of claim. The case was struck out after the tribunal concluded that, in light of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake [2021] UKSC 8, the claim did not appear to have reasonable prospects of success and because the claimant had not replied to correspondence or otherwise actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.