Case 2410900/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Rebecchi v Tranquil Spa Hale Barns Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410900/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Rebecchi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Rebecchi brought a wages claim against Tranquil Spa Hale Barns Limited. Employment Judge Leach, sitting at Manchester on 3 January 2020, found that the respondent had made deductions from the claimant's wages in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal held that the unlawful deductions totalled £988.97 gross. That sum comprised £573.13 for 65.5 hours worked at £8.75 an hour, £32.71 in commission payments, £37.50 in bonus pay, and £345.63 in unpaid holiday pay.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £988.97, being the amount deducted in contravention of section 13 ERA 1996. The accompanying notice explained the tribunal interest regime and recorded the relevant decision day as 20 January 2020 and the calculation day as 21 January 2020, but no separate interest award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found deductions from the claimant's wages in contravention of section 13 ERA 1996. The deductions totalled £988.97 gross, made up of £573.13 for 65.5 hours worked at £8.75 an hour, £32.71 commission, £37.50 bonus, and £345.63 unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £989 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £989
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.