Case 2410916/2023 · Employment Tribunal
T Ankers v 4net Technologies Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410916/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
T Ankers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten, sitting alone at Manchester by video on 15 and 16 August 2024, decided the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was well-founded. The tribunal held that T Ankers was unfairly dismissed by 4net Technologies Limited.
The tribunal also found that there was a 50% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed for redundancy in any event. That finding indicates a likely reduction on remedy, but no final compensation figure was determined in this judgment.
A remedy hearing was directed to take place on a date to be fixed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It also found there was a 50% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed for redundancy in any event. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.