Case 2410936/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Wilde v Kam Enterprises Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410936/2023
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Wilde
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Kam Enterprises Limited, did not present a valid response in time. The Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim on the papers. The title of the case was amended to reflect the correct respondent name.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr C Wilde's wages and ordered payment of £2,235.47 gross. That figure was broken down as underpayments of £747.37 for June 2023, £654.50 for July 2023, and £833.60 for September 2023.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for accrued untaken leave on termination. It found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued untaken leave entitlement when employment ended and ordered payment of £1,073.26 gross. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any tax liabilities arising if the gross sums are paid without deduction at source.
The hearing listed for 12 August 2024 was cancelled following the judgment. The written decision was dated 18 April 2024 and sent to the parties on 1 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,235.47, made up of underpayments of £747.37 for June 2023, £654.50 for July 2023, and £833.60 for September 2023. | Upheld | — | £2,235 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay accrued untaken leave entitlement on termination of employment and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,073.26. | Upheld | — | £1,073 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,309
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.