Case 2410957/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Halcrow v The Purple Deli Company Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2410957/2021
- Decision date
- 14 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Halcrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 16 March 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Phil Allen proceeded to make a liability determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. On that basis, it ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £210.37. The judgment does not break the award down into separate heads of loss.
The accompanying notice explains the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and states the relevant judgment day as 14 March 2022, with interest starting to accrue from 15 March 2022 at the stipulated rate of 8% if the award remains unpaid after 14 days. No separate interest figure is set out in the judgment text itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 liability judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £210.37. | Upheld | — | £210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £210
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.