Case 2410961/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Harvey v Axiom Ince Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410961/2023
- Decision date
- 28 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Harvey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSitting in chambers at Manchester on 30 May 2024 under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge K M Ross determined the claims of Miss A Harvey against Axiom Ince Limited (In Administration) in the absence of both parties. The Tribunal found that the claimant's claims for a redundancy payment, notice pay and two days' unpaid wages were each well-founded, and ordered the respondent to pay £8,574.15 by way of redundancy payment, £6,859.32 representing 12 weeks' gross pay at £571.61 per week for notice, and £228.64 for the unpaid wages.
The Tribunal also found well-founded the claimant's complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent had failed to comply with the collective consultation requirements of section 188, on the basis that the claimant was based at the Leeds office, an establishment where more than 20 individuals were placed at risk of redundancy. By way of protective award under section 189(3), the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a sum equivalent to remuneration for the period of 90 days beginning on 30 October 2023, the claimant having been dismissed for redundancy between 3 and 30 October 2023.
The judgment annexes the standard recoupment notice in respect of the protective award and the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, identifying the relevant decision day as 28 June 2024 and the stipulated interest rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claim well-founded and ordered a redundancy payment of £8,574.15. | Upheld | — | £8,574 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim well-founded; awarded 12 weeks' gross pay at £571.61 per week = £6,859.32. | Upheld | — | £6,859 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for two days' unpaid wages well-founded; awarded £228.64. | Upheld | — | £229 |
| Other | Protective award under section 189(3) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements; respondent ordered to pay the claimant a payment equivalent to remuneration for the period of 90 days beginning on 30 October 2023. Monetary equivalent not quantified within the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(3) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.