Case 2410977/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Robinson v Market Tobacconist Limited T/a Nicohit — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410977/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 6 February 2020, Employment Judge Howard sat alone and dealt with two claims brought by Miss N Robinson against Market Tobacconist Limited t/a Nicohit. The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn, and the judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The disability discrimination claim was dismissed because the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to determine it. The claim had been brought outside the statutory time limit, and the Employment Judge decided that it would not be just and equitable to extend time in the circumstances. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claim was presented beyond the statutory time limit and it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable to extend time
- statutory time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.