Case 2411003/2023 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mrs C McCallig 2. Mrs S Smith v Blamire Bakery Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411003/2023
- Decision date
- 7 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mrs C McCallig 2. Mrs S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time to the claims brought by Mrs C McCallig (2411003/2023) and Mrs S Smith (2411004/2023), and Employment Judge McDonald determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgments were issued in gross sums, with the tribunal noting that the claimants might receive less if the respondent applied statutory deductions before payment.
For each claimant the tribunal upheld a claim for a statutory redundancy payment arising from constructive dismissal, a claim for damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice (calculated as the statutory maximum of 12 weeks' pay), a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages covering the period 15 February 2023 to 9 August 2023, and a claim for unpaid holiday entitlement. Mrs McCallig was awarded a total gross sum of £16,263.50 and Mrs Smith a total gross sum of £25,750.
A notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, recording the relevant decision day as 7 March 2024, the calculation day as 8 March 2024, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum, payable if the awards are not satisfied within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mrs C McCallig: statutory redundancy payment by reason of constructive dismissal (12 x 1.5 weeks' pay x £285). | Upheld | — | £5,130 |
| Breach of contract | Mrs C McCallig: dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice (£285 x 12 weeks). | Upheld | — | £3,420 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs C McCallig: unauthorised deduction from wages 15/2/23–9/8/23 (£285 x 25 weeks less £124 received). | Upheld | — | £7,001 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs C McCallig: 10 days' untaken leave @ £71.25 per day. | Upheld | — | £713 |
| Redundancy | Mrs S Smith (case 2411004/2023, heard together): statutory redundancy payment by reason of constructive dismissal (18 x 1.5 weeks' pay x £392.50). | Upheld | — | £10,598 |
| Breach of contract | Mrs S Smith: dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice (£392.50 x 12 weeks). | Upheld | — | £4,710 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs S Smith: unauthorised deduction from wages 15/2/23–9/8/23 (£392.50 x 25 weeks less £155 received). |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £42,014
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.