Case 2411010/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Helps v Iam Compliant Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411010/2021
- Decision date
- 30 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Helps
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge K M Ross in Liverpool remotely by CVP on 23 June 2022, struck out the claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant did not have two years' service.
It also struck out the claimant's automatically unfair dismissal claim under sections 99(1) and 99(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999. The tribunal said the dismissal was not of a prescribed kind and was not within the prescribed circumstances in the legislation. The judgment stated that the Equality Act 2010 complaints identified at the case management hearing on 31 January 2022 were unaffected and would proceed. No remedy was determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant did not have two years' service for the sections 95 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim, so it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Struck out because the dismissal was not of a prescribed kind and was not within the prescribed circumstances under sections 99(1) and 99(3) Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- sections 95 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 99(1) and 99(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.