Case 2411024/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Stanley v Richard Greenough and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411024/2021
- Decision date
- 22 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J Stanley
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 19 July 2022, Employment Judge Mark Butler gave Miss Stanley an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that this strike-out process was then completed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the tribunal’s letter dated 19 July 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The judgment itself does not separately discuss this cause of action, but the case listing categories include breach of contract. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the tribunal’s letter dated 19 July 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The judgment itself does not separately discuss this cause of action, but the case listing categories include unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.