Case 2411058/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Thomas v My Life Quote Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411058/2019
- Decision date
- 5 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Regional Employment Judge Parkin Date. The tribunal dealt with the claim on the papers and did not list the hearing on 12 December 2019, which was cancelled. The judgment names Miss C Thomas as claimant and My Life Quote Ltd as respondent.
The tribunal upheld two claims. First, it found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,723.29. Second, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £924.12.
The judgment does not set out any separate compensatory, basic award, or interest calculation beyond the standard notice explaining that awards may carry interest if unpaid after the relevant decision day. The bottom-line sums in the judgment are therefore the two net payments ordered under the two wage and holiday-pay findings, totalling £2,647.41.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,723.29. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £924.12. | Upheld | — | £924 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,647
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.