Case 2411064/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Murray v Lancashire County Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 2411064/2021
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend her claim to include a breach of contract claim for notice pay.
The Tribunal struck out the respondent's response under rule 37(1)(c) of the 2013 rules of procedure. It made case management orders about the respondent's potential continued participation in remedy proceedings and required the parties to inform the Tribunal whether a remedy hearing was required.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The response was struck out pursuant to rule 37(1)(c), with participation in remedy proceedings to be addressed by case management orders. The judgment does not record a final liability or remedy outcome for the unfair dismissal claim in the supplied text. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's application to amend her claim to include breach of contract (notice pay) was refused; the judgment does not adjudicate a substantive breach of contract claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(c) of the 2013 rules of procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.