Case 2411082/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Renee Lowe v C & A Cerdyn Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411082/2019
- Decision date
- 24 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Renee Lowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Buzzard entered judgment for Mrs Renee Lowe under Rule 21 after the respondent confirmed that the claims were not defended. The tribunal found the claimant's breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay to be well-founded and awarded £4,902.54 as compensation. The judgment states that this sum represented 5 weeks' gross notice pay at £82.10 per week.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim and ordered payment of £615.75. The judgment records that the redundancy payment was calculated using 5 years' continuous service as at the date of dismissal, service over the age of 41, and gross weekly pay of £82.10.
A holiday pay claim for accrued and untaken annual leave as at termination also succeeded. The tribunal awarded £41.10 for 5 hours of outstanding holiday, calculated at £8.21 per hour. The accompanying interest notice stated that unpaid sums would carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within 14 days of the written judgment being sent, with a stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards £4,902.54 for unpaid notice pay and states that this represents 5 weeks' gross notice pay at £82.10 per week; the stated amount does not arithmetically match that explanation in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £4,903 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £616 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £41 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,559
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.