Case 2411084/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Razzak v Qiagen Limited and 6 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411084/2019
- Decision date
- 5 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney Date
Parties
8 namedClaimant
Mr A Razzak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Feeney recorded that an Unless Order had been made in the Case Management Orders sent to the parties on 5 May 2020. The order required the claimant to comply with paragraph 5.2 by 12 May 2020. The claimant did not comply until 13 May 2020.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not reach the merits of the pleaded allegations. It also states that the hearings listed for 17 August 2020, 12 October 2020, and 22 February to 2 March 2021 were vacated and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with an Unless Order. The text does not set out the substantive disability allegation, but the case listing identifies disability discrimination as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with an Unless Order. The text does not set out the substantive race allegation, but the case listing identifies race discrimination as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.