Case 2411150/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Morgan v Fashion Hub Global Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2411150/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunals on 20 September 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Phil Allen determined the matter under rule 21 on the papers. The hearing listed for 19 January 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Fashion Hub Global Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss O Morgan's wages and ordered payment of £520.41 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £468.16.
The written judgment notice stated that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day. No separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £520 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £989
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.