Case 2411170/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Stocks v Trigen Land Development Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411170/2019
- Decision date
- 14 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Stocks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHeld in Manchester on 10 August 2020 before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone, the tribunal heard from Ms E Stocks and the respondent did not attend. It found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,420.00.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of £721.00 gross. It further found that outstanding accrued holiday entitlement due on termination had not been paid, awarding £665.00 gross, and that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £285.00 gross. The written judgment was sent to the parties on 14 August 2020, and the attached interest notice recorded a relevant decision day of 14 August 2020, a calculation day of 15 August 2020, and a stipulated interest rate of 8% for any unpaid sums.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,420 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £721 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £665 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £285 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,091
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.