Case 2411176/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Clare v Ruby Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411176/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Clare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester on 18 November 2019 before Employment Judge Ross, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending, the tribunal held that the respondent owed the claimant statutory sick pay of £226.20, holiday pay for three days accrued but untaken on termination of £207.69, and notice pay of £1,387.50. The total sum ordered to be paid within 14 days was £1,821.39.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The document therefore records the monetary awards and the standard interest notice, but no further written findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment awards statutory sick pay but does not identify the legal label for this head of claim in the text provided. | Upheld | — | £226 |
| Holiday pay | Award for three days' holidays accrued but untaken on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £208 |
| Breach of contract | Award for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,388 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,821
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.