Case 2411221/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Abiodun Lawal v Hays Specialist Recruitment Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411221/2021
- Decision date
- 11 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Abiodun Lawal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel at a CVP hearing before Employment Judge L Cowen sitting alone.
The judgment struck out the claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract. It also recorded that the claim for unlawful deduction of wages may continue.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit. No remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for unfair dismissal is struck out. Oral reasons were given at the hearing; no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for breach of contract is struck out. Oral reasons were given at the hearing; no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deduction of wages may continue; it does not determine the merits or final outcome of that claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.