Case 2411226/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Soos v P J Southport Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411226/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Soos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 14 November 2019, Employment Judge Buzzard heard Ms K Soos's claims against P J Southport Limited. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal recorded oral reasons and issued its written judgment on 3 December 2019.
The tribunal held that Ms Soos's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded in relation to unpaid work in April 2019. It found that the respondent had failed to pay her for 8 hours of work and ordered payment of £65.68, calculated at £8.21 per hour.
The tribunal also held that Ms Soos's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded in relation to untaken annual leave on termination. It found that she was owed payment in lieu of accrued but untaken leave and ordered payment of £529.54, calculated as 1.5 weeks' leave based on an average of 43 hours per week at £8.21 per hour. The judgment also included a notice explaining that interest may apply if the sums remain unpaid after 14 days, but it did not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay Ms K Soos for 8 hours of work in April 2019 and ordered payment of £65.68, calculated at 8 hours at £8.21 per hour. | Upheld | — | £66 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay Ms K Soos in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination and ordered payment of £529.54, calculated as 1.5 weeks' leave at an average of 43 hours per week at £8.21 per hour. | Upheld | — | £530 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £595
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.