Case 2411238/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Cunningham v Twiggled Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411238/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant gave evidence on oath. The respondent did not file a response form and did not attend the hearing, despite notice of the claim having been sent to its registered office. On the evidence heard, the tribunal found that Miss E Cunningham had a right to a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered Twiggled Ltd to pay £693.00.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's breach of contract complaint relating to salary between March 2015 and May 2019 and ordered payment of £19,028.83 as the net sum due under the contract of employment. The unlawful deductions from pay complaint was found to be well-founded, but no separate order was made because the same sums were covered by the breach of contract award.
The remaining complaints were dismissed. The notice pay breach of contract complaint failed because the tribunal found that the claimant worked her notice period. The complaint concerning failure to forward employer and employee pension contributions to the pension scheme was dismissed because the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction over such matters. The total amount payable under the judgment was £19,721.83.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had the right to a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £693 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to salary between March 2015 and May 2019 succeeded; the tribunal ordered payment of the net sum due under the contract of employment. | Upheld | — | £19,029 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the complaint was well-founded, but made no separate order because the deducted sums were covered by the breach of contract award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay was dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant worked her notice period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The complaint about failure to forward employer and employee pension contributions to the pension scheme was dismissed because the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction over such matters. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,722
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.