Case 2411240/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs D Davies (2) Mr R Davies v THDD Limited (in voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411240/2023
- Decision date
- 13 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs D Davies (2) Mr R Davies
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants brought claims for failure to pay holiday pay and arrears of wages. The first respondent was in voluntary liquidation and did not enter a response. The second respondent was joined as a party and relied on written representations, explaining that payments had not been made for holiday pay or arrears because information from the liquidator suggested no further entitlement.
The Tribunal found that the information suggesting the claimants had exhausted their holiday entitlement was incorrect. On the claimants' witness evidence and documents, the Tribunal was satisfied that, taking 14 July 2023 as the termination date for holiday pay purposes, each claimant had 5 days of untaken holiday entitlement.
The Tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay the first claimant £636.21 net and the second claimant £340.69 net for holiday pay. The claims for arrears of pay were postponed because the date of termination of employment was unclear and further information, witness statements, documents, and representations were required before those claims could be determined.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal upheld the holiday pay claims for both claimants, ordering the first respondent to pay £636.21 to the first claimant and £340.69 to the second claimant for 5 days' untaken annual leave each. No judgment was made against the second respondent. The arrears of pay claims were postponed and are not treated as adjudicated claims in this extraction. | Upheld | — | £977 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £977
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- reg. 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- rule 29 of its rules of procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.