Case 2411250/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Moore v Gilbert Gilkes & Gordon Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411250/2023
- Decision date
- 21 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms A Jackson, Mr A J Gill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Moore brought two disability discrimination complaints against Gilbert Gilkes & Gordon Limited: unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. Both complaints were heard at Manchester on 14, 15, 17 and 18 October and 15 November 2024 before Employment Judge Benson with Ms A Jackson and Mr A J Gill sitting as members.
The tribunal held that neither complaint was well-founded. The written record records only the outcome of the oral judgment given at the hearing and does not set out further reasons in the decision itself. Both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.