Case 2411255/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Goodwin v Tyldsley Conservative Club — 2023
- Case reference
- 2411255/2021
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Goodwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 8 March 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued and because of breach of tribunal orders as set out in the respondent representative's email of 6 March 2023. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge McDonald struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 8 March 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on the proposed strike-out for non-pursuit and breach of tribunal orders. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.