Case 2411293/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Tabakovich v MCR Apts UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411293/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim. Proceeding on the information before it under Rule 21, the Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,610.58. The judgment does not break that figure down into separate components or identify any additional heads of loss.
The attached interest notice states that, if the sum is not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, statutory interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. The notice records 8 February 2022 as the relevant decision day, 9 February 2022 as the calculation day, and 8% as the stipulated rate of interest.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment issued under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response. On the information before the Tribunal, it found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,610.58. | Upheld | — | £1,611 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,611
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.