Case 2411296/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Nelson – Lay representative For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411296/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Nelson – Lay representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester on 14 January 2020 before Employment Judge A M Buchanan, the respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was considered. The basis of the application was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal dismissed the strike out application. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the decision notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This records the tribunal's strike-out application, not a substantive liability claim. The application under Rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.