Case 2411316/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Ashleigh Butterworth v Dawnvale Café Components Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411316/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Ashleigh Butterworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 25 November 2019 before Employment Judge Hoey sitting alone. The respondent did not attend or represent itself. The only live issue was the claimant's claim for accrued holiday pay, and the tribunal told the claimant she still had to explain what she was seeking and why despite the respondent's absence.
The claimant said that when her employment ended she was told she would receive money for the holidays that would have accrued during her notice period, namely 2.5 days' pay. She produced a letter dated 1 July 2019 in which the respondent expressly accepted that she would be paid, and was due to be paid, the holidays that would accrue during the notice period. The tribunal found that the claimant had already received her notice pay, but the holiday element had not been paid.
On that basis the tribunal held that the respondent had accepted liability for the holiday entitlement and that the claimant was entitled to judgment for the gross sum of £182.69, described as the accrued holiday entitlement due during that period. The written judgment was sent to the parties on 12 December 2019 and included the standard tribunal interest notice, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had expressly accepted in a letter dated 1 July 2019 that the claimant would be paid for the holidays accruing during her notice period, but had not paid that sum. | Upheld | — | £183 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £183
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.