Case 2411317/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Cadman v British Car Auctions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411317/2019
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Cadman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the proceedings in Mrs S Cadman v British Car Auctions Ltd were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. The judgment does not contain findings on liability, remedy, or any factual dispute between the parties.
The only substantive disposal in the judgment is the dismissal following withdrawal, dated 5 December 2019 and sent to the parties on 18 December 2019. No reasons on the merits are given, and no award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not separately set out the breach of contract head, but the gov.uk listing identifies breach of contract as one of the claim categories. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not separately set out the unfair dismissal head, but the gov.uk listing identifies unfair dismissal as one of the claim categories. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.