Case 2411334/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Robinson v Grade Café Bar Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411334/2019
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response and notified the tribunal that it did not contest the proceedings. The claimant, Miss E Robinson, brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Grade Cafe Bar Ltd.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay compensation for 129 hours of work in May 2019 at the rate of £8.50 per hour, producing an award of £1,096.50.
The judgment states that the sum was calculated without statutory deductions and may be taxable in the claimant's hands. The respondent was ordered to pay the sum on or before 13 December 2019. The attached interest notice states the general tribunal interest position if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but no separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response and notified the tribunal that it did not contest the proceedings. | Upheld | — | £1,097 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,097
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.