Case 2411398/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Martin v Wayne Austin IFA Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411398/2021
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester hearing on 31 January 2022 before Employment Judge Phil Allen, the respondent agreed by consent that it had made two unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages: £192.31 net for July 2021 and £51.37 gross for August 2021. Those claims were therefore recorded as succeeding.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not paid the claimant the full amount due as payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave. It ordered the respondent to pay £384.60 gross in respect of that holiday pay shortfall.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim, so far as it related to notice, did not succeed. The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach the contract of employment with regard to notice and dismissed that claim. The monetary awards recorded in the judgment total £628.28, with the separate notice on interest explaining the usual 14-day period for payment before statutory interest would run if sums remained unpaid.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal recorded an unauthorised deduction from wages in July 2021 in the net sum of £192.31. | Upheld | — | £192 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal recorded an unauthorised deduction from wages in August 2021 in the gross sum of £51.37. | Upheld | — | £51 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid the claimant the full amount due as payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave and ordered payment of £384.60 gross. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found there was no breach of contract in relation to notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £628
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.