Case 2411412/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Waheed v Language Empire Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411412/2018
- Decision date
- 13 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grundy REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Waheed
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 29 April 2019, Employment Judge Grundy considered the claimant's claims arising from the ending of her work as an interpreter at Wythenshawe Hospital. The tribunal recorded that there was no criticism of the claimant's work, and that the dispute concerned whether her employment had transferred from Language Empire Limited to D A Languages Ltd or had otherwise ended, together with a claimed entitlement to a redundancy payment.
The tribunal held that the breach of contract claim and the claim for failure to consult under the TUPE provisions were out of time. It found that it was reasonably practicable to present those claims within the relevant time limit and that they were not presented within any reasonable further period. The tribunal noted that the claimant had notice of the transfer issue by late October 2017, but the claim was not presented until 31 May 2018.
By contrast, the redundancy payment claim was allowed to proceed. The tribunal found that the claimant had referred the question of her right to a redundancy payment to the tribunal within the relevant statutory period and that it was just and equitable for the claim to continue. In reaching that view, it took account of the reasons for delay, the length of the delay, the limited prejudice to the respondents, and the claimant's long service. The claim was listed for a full hearing before a different Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Held to be out of time; the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction because it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and it was not presented within any reasonable further period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Failure to consult under the TUPE provisions was held to be out of time and outside the tribunal's jurisdiction for the same reason as the breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Initially out of time, but the tribunal exercised its discretion under section 164 ERA 1996 and allowed the claim to proceed to a full hearing; no entitlement or amount was decided at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonable practicability test
- just and equitable test
- s.164 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.