Case 2411415/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wood v Lakeview Rest Homes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411415/2019
- Decision date
- 11 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr P Wood's proceedings against Lakeview Rest Homes Ltd under case numbers 2411415/2019, 2402850/2019, 2410046/2019 and 2410737/2019 were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claims and the respondent withdrew its contract claims. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded allegations or make any findings on the merits.
No award or other remedy is recorded. Employment Judge Parkin signed the judgment on 26 March 2020 and it was sent to the parties on 11 May 2020.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant and the employer's contract claims by the respondent. The pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context; the judgment does not separately set out the allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The short judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claims. The pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context; the judgment does not separately set out the allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claims. The pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context; the judgment does not separately set out the allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claims. The pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context; the judgment does not separately set out the allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claims. The pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context; the judgment does not separately set out the allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.