Case 2411416/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Allen v Remedy Café & Kitchen Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411416/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Remedy Café & Kitchen Limited, failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D Allen's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £692.75, calculated as £8.91 multiplied by 77.75 hours, within 14 days of the judgment.
The judgment also records the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that unpaid sums may carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the judgment was sent. The hearing listed for 22 December 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment was made under Rule 21 and found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £693 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £693
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.