Miss H Marcus v Sheldrakes — 2022

Case reference: 2411434/2021
Decision date: 14 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Howard JUDGMENT

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss H Marcus

Respondent

Sheldrakes

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 14 February 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. No sufficient representations were made, and no hearing was requested.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing context.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.