Case 2411443/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Shaw v LN2 Ltd trading as Mr Nitro’s — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411443/2019
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not present a response. On the material before the Judge, the tribunal found that LN2 Ltd trading as Mr Nitro’s had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss J Shaw’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £154.80. It did not make any award of compensation because the claimant had not provided evidence of any loss directly sustained as a result of the non-payment.
A separate notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 recorded that interest would accrue if the sum was not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, but the judgment itself did not specify any interest amount payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent did not present a response and, on the information before the Judge, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £154.80. | Upheld | — | £155 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £155
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.