Case 2411467/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411467/2023
- Decision date
- 22 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr D Wilson, Mrs C Titherington
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 17-18 October 2024 before Employment Judge Slater, with Mr D Wilson and Mrs C Titherington as lay members. The parties were identified as Claimant A and Respondent B. The tribunal first decided that it was just and equitable to consider the complaints out of time.
On the merits, the tribunal held that the complaints of direct and indirect sex discrimination were not well founded and dismissed them. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the published record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination complaint; the tribunal held it was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination complaint; the tribunal held it was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.