Case 2411505/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Crickson v Meddo Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411505/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Crickson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment and ordered the respondent to pay £4,830. It also upheld three uncontested monetary claims arising from the employment contract: £100 for an unpaid bonus, £56.08 for unreimbursed expenses, and £460 for outstanding holiday pay due on termination.
The tribunal further upheld the claimant's notice pay claim, but only to the extent conceded by the respondent in its ET3 and expressly agreed by the claimant at the hearing. The award for that claim was £1,104, representing 12 days' notice pay.
The claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of weeks worked in hand did not succeed, because it was withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed on that basis.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Contract claim for unreimbursed expenses; uncontested in the respondent's ET3. | Upheld | — | £56 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment was uncontested in the respondent's ET3. | Upheld | — | £4,830 |
| Breach of contract | Contract claim for unpaid bonus; uncontested in the respondent's ET3. | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for outstanding unpaid holiday pay on termination; uncontested in the respondent's ET3. | Upheld | — | £460 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded only to the extent conceded in the respondent's ET3 and agreed by the claimant at hearing; award represents 12 days' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,104 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for failure to pay for weeks worked in hand was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.