Case 2411524/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Owens v British Car Auctions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411524/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Owens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Owens was employed by British Car Auctions Ltd from May 2005 until June 2019 as a Transport Manager. She was dismissed for alleged gross misconduct after a key box key was passed to a third-party haulier. The tribunal accepted that the respondent had a potentially fair reason for dismissal in misconduct, but the real issue was whether the respondent acted reasonably in investigating and relying on that allegation.
The tribunal found that the investigation was not even-handed. BCA did not interview obvious witnesses who might have confirmed or undermined Mrs Owens' account, including Jane Judson, other regular hauliers, or Charlotte Watling. It also did not properly test the conflicting evidence about whether handing out key box keys to known hauliers had been authorised or tolerated in practice. The tribunal noted that Mrs Owens had produced several supporting statements, but the respondent largely declined to investigate them.
The tribunal also found that there was nothing explicit in the disciplinary policy or SOP saying that giving a key box key to a haulier was gross misconduct, and no clear indication that the hauliers in question were to be treated as customers in the sense used by the SOP. Mrs Owens was a long-serving employee with a clean disciplinary record. In those circumstances, the dismissal was not within the band of reasonable responses and was unfair. The tribunal also rejected any Polkey reduction and did not make a contributory fault reduction, although it accepted that Mrs Owens had handed out keys, because the evidence did not allow a finding that that conduct was culpable given the uncertainty about the accepted practice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded on liability only. The tribunal found the dismissal unfair, but compensation was to be determined at a later remedy hearing listed for 3 April 2020. The tribunal also held there should be no reduction for Polkey or contributory fault at that stage. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Burchell v British Home Stores
- band of reasonable responses
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Sainsbury's Supermarket v Hitt
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones
- Foley v Post Office
- Midland Bank plc v Madden
- s.123(6) ERA
- Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.