Case 2411563/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Mitchell v K & J Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411563/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge Ross on 8 January 2020, granted leave to amend the respondent name to K & J Solutions Ltd. The respondent did not attend the hearing and the claimant appeared in person.
The only substantive claim recorded in the judgment was for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal found that claim well-founded and held that it succeeded.
The tribunal ordered K & J Solutions Ltd to pay the claimant £1,053 within seven days of the date of the judgment. The separate notice on interest explained the tribunal's standard interest position if sums are not paid in time, but no separate interest award was made in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal granted leave to amend the respondent name to K & J Solutions Ltd. The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim was found well-founded and succeeded, with an order that the respondent pay £1,053 within seven days. | Upheld | — | £1,053 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,053
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.