Case 2411582/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Officer v Butcher’s Block Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411582/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Officer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Ross Date. The tribunal found that Butcher’s Block Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Officer’s wages for 17/5/19-28/6/19 and ordered payment of £343 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,773, calculated in the judgment as 11 x £343.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £1,029 gross for 3 weeks’ holiday. It also found an unlawful deduction from wages arising from non-payment of statutory sick pay between 24/6/19 and 22/7/19, ordering £294.09 net. The judgment states a total payable of £5,539.09 within 14 days; the listed awards add to £5,439.09.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for 17/5/19-28/6/19. | Upheld | — | £343 |
| Redundancy | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and calculates the payment as 11 x £343. | Upheld | — | £3,773 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 3 weeks' holiday gross. | Upheld | — | £1,029 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages for non-payment of statutory sick pay between 24/6/19 and 22/7/19. The listed awards sum to £5,439.09, but the judgment states a total of £5,539.09. | Upheld | — | £294 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,539
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.