Case 2411585/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. F. Thatcher v Kuku Hair & Beauty Ltd. — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411585/2019
- Decision date
- 20 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. F. Thatcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claims were not resisted by the respondent and no hearing was held. The tribunal found that Mrs F Thatcher had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It ordered Kuku Hair & Beauty Ltd to pay £1,275.00 in respect of that redundancy payment.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £756.50 in respect of holiday pay. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded in her claims and includes the standard interest notice, but it does not set out any separate interest figure or other compensatory elements.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,275.00. | Upheld | — | £1,275 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £756.50 in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £757 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,032
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.