Case 2411612/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Perkins v Berkeley Care Ltd FAO: David Barker — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411612/2019
- Decision date
- 24 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Perkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent order in Mr D Perkins v Berkeley Care Ltd FAO: David Barker, heard at Manchester on 29 November 2019 before Employment Judge Dunlop. The tribunal did not determine liability on the underlying unlawful deduction from wages claim.
Instead, the tribunal ordered that all proceedings be stayed until 27 December 2019 so that the parties could put into effect settlement terms they had agreed. The order also provided that, if no application was made for the hearing to be relisted by that date, the claim would then be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No award was made in the order and no findings on the merits or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal stayed all proceedings until 27 December 2019 so the parties could put into effect the terms of a settlement they had agreed. The order stated that if no application was made to relist the hearing by that date, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.