Case 2411614/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Preda v Champion Mouldings Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411614/2019
- Decision date
- 15 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Preda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 July 2020, following a preliminary hearing on 15 June 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss D Preda an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on whether her unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out. The issue was that she did not appear to have the two years' service required for the Tribunal to consider an unfair dismissal claim.
Miss Preda did not make any representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining discrimination and/or harassment claims were still listed for hearing on 29 November 2021. No finding was made on those remaining claims in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after a letter dated 7 July 2020 invited representations on whether the claim should be struck out because the claimant did not appear to have the two years' service required. The claimant made no sufficient representations or request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.