Case 2411652/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Wagstaff v Fairhaven Café Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411652/2023
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr Representation
- Venue
- Manchester via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Wagstaff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester via CVP on 28 May 2024, Employment Judge Serr found that Fairhaven Café Limited had made an unlawful deduction from Miss G Wagstaff’s wages. The written judgment orders the respondent to pay the net sum of £63 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,260 as damages for breach of contract, net of tax.
The written record contains the tribunal’s final orders but does not set out further written reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing. On the face of the record, the total monetary award is £1,323.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £63 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted from wages. | Upheld | — | £63 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was found well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,260 as damages net of tax. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.