Case 2411667/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Murtagh v Mikhail Hotels Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411667/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Murtagh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sharkett, sitting at Manchester by CVP on 16 May 2024, found that the claimant Mr L Murtagh was unfairly dismissed by Mikhail Hotels Ltd and that his claim of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The Tribunal also found that the claimant's breach of contract claim for notice pay was well founded, holding that the respondent was not entitled to dismiss the claimant without notice or payment in lieu of notice. The Tribunal further found that the claimant did not contribute to his own dismissal by culpable or blameworthy conduct.
The Tribunal ordered monetary compensation for unfair dismissal comprising a basic award of £1,725 (calculated as 1.5 weeks pay for each full year worked), loss of earnings of £1,104, and loss of statutory rights of £500, together with a 25% uplift for the respondent's failure to follow the ACAS Code, producing a total unfair dismissal compensation figure of £4,161.25. A further £1,150 was awarded in lieu of notice not given or paid on termination, with the claimant responsible for any employee tax or NI liability on that sum.
The total award was recorded as £5,311.25. The Tribunal stated that the recoupment provisions did not apply to any part of the award. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Total compensation for unfair dismissal comprised basic award of £1,725 (1.5 weeks pay per full year), loss of earnings £1,104, loss of statutory rights £500, with a 25% uplift for the respondent's failure to follow the ACAS Code. Tribunal found the claimant did not contribute to his own dismissal by culpable or blameworthy conduct. | Upheld | — | £4,161 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded. Tribunal found the respondent was not entitled to dismiss the claimant without notice or payment in lieu of notice. £1,150 awarded in lieu of notice; claimant responsible for any tax/NI liability. | Upheld | — | £1,150 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Listed on gov.uk under 'Unlawful Deduction from Wages' but the written judgment text does not separately adjudicate an unlawful deduction of wages claim; only unfair dismissal and breach of contract (notice pay) are addressed in the judgment paragraphs. Outcome unclear from the available text; recorded as 'other' with reduced confidence. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,311
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,725
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,604
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.