Case 2411671/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J A Green v Gaudium Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411671/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J A Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Cookson found that Gaudium Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by underpaying statutory sick pay. The judgment identifies underpayments of £234.66 for August 2023 and £471.30 for September 2023, making a gross award of £705.96 on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's untaken annual leave entitlement of 13 days. Using a daily rate of £66, it ordered payment of £858 gross for that entitlement. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax liabilities if the gross award is paid without tax being deducted at source.
The total gross sum ordered was £1,563.96, being the combined amounts in paragraphs 1 and 3 of the judgment. A separate notice recorded that interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 would run from 18 April 2024 at 8% per annum if the award was not paid within 14 days of the written decision, and the hearing listed for 3 June 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages found because statutory sick pay was underpaid by £234.66 for August 2023 and £471.30 for September 2023. | Upheld | — | £706 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have failed to pay untaken annual leave entitlement of 13 days, calculated at £66 per day. | Upheld | — | £858 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,564
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.