Case 2411676/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Beauness v Gaudium Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411676/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Beauness
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claims under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge Cookson found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,043 gross, comprising £968 in underpaid wages from September 2023 and £75 in expenses.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday pay of two weeks at the termination of employment and ordered payment of £484 gross. The total gross sum ordered was £1,527, and the hearing previously listed for 3 June 2024 was cancelled. A notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was issued, with the relevant decision day recorded as 17 April 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Comprises underpayment of wages from September 2023 of £968 and expenses of £75. | Upheld | — | £1,043 |
| Holiday pay | Two weeks' holiday pay unpaid at termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £484 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,527
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.