Case 2411679/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Wilson v SR Marine Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2411679/2019
- Decision date
- 25 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in the claim of Mrs A Wilson against SR Marine Ltd. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 24 June 2020 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 November 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment contains no merits findings on any underlying substantive complaint and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The strike-out judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 November 2019 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.