Case 2411685/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Fogg v Neenah Red Bridge International Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411685/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Fogg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester hearing on 29 November 2019, Employment Judge Phil Allen, sitting alone, held that Mr S Fogg had been dismissed in breach of contract for the remainder of his notice period. The tribunal ordered Neenah Red Bridge International Limited to pay gross damages of £1,538.40 for that notice pay claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered a further gross payment of £384.60. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note appended to the decision.
The respondent’s counterclaim for breach of contract was rejected as not well founded and did not succeed. The total amount ordered by the tribunal was £1,923.00 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of the remainder of his notice and awarded gross damages of £1,538.40. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded gross pay of £384.60. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent’s counterclaim for breach of contract was found not well founded and did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,923
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.